Skip to content
Mark-t.aiMark-t.ai
Back to Blog
Running Local LLMs: A Complete Guide to Self-Hosted AI

Running Local LLMs: A Complete Guide to Self-Hosted AI

Published on 1/29/2026By Mark-T Team

Running Local LLMs: A Complete Guide to Self-Hosted AI

The landscape of AI has shifted dramatically. What once required expensive cloud API calls can now run on consumer hardware. Local LLMs offer privacy, cost savings, and customization that cloud services cannot match. This guide covers everything you need to know about running AI models on your own machines.

Why Run LLMs Locally?

Privacy and Data Control

Running models locally provides complete data sovereignty, meaning your data never leaves your network and no third party logs or trains on your inputs. This makes local deployment ideal for organizations with strict compliance requirements under regulations like HIPAA or GDPR, and particularly valuable for sensitive industries including healthcare, legal, and finance. Beyond privacy, local deployment eliminates external dependencies entirely. Your AI works offline without internet connectivity, faces no API rate limits or service outages, and gives you full control over model behavior and outputs.

Cost Efficiency

The economics of local LLMs often favor one-time hardware investment over recurring cloud costs. Cloud API pricing scales directly with usage, while local hardware represents a pay-once, run-forever model with no per-token charges for inference. For a practical comparison, running one million tokens daily through a cloud API typically costs between sixty and two hundred dollars monthly. A local GPU setup costs between five hundred and two thousand dollars as a one-time investment, achieving return on investment within three to twelve months depending on usage volume.

Customization and Control

Local deployment unlocks freedom to fine-tune models on proprietary data, customize behavior without restrictions, and experiment without incurring cloud costs. Performance optimization becomes possible by eliminating network round-trips, ensuring consistent response times, enabling real-time applications, and opening edge deployment possibilities.

Hardware Requirements

CPU-Only Setups

For CPU-only deployment, minimum requirements include sixteen gigabytes of RAM (though thirty-two or more is recommended), a modern multi-core CPU with eight or more cores, fast SSD storage with NVMe preferred, supporting models with seven billion parameters or smaller. Performance expectations for CPU-only setups range from one to five tokens per second for seven billion parameter models. This setup is acceptable for development and testing, viable for low-volume production, and good for experimentation.

GPU Acceleration

Consumer gaming GPUs provide excellent acceleration. NVIDIA RTX 3080 and 3090 cards offer ten to twenty-four gigabytes of VRAM, while RTX 4080 and 4090 cards provide sixteen to twenty-four gigabytes. AMD alternatives are emerging but remain less well supported by current tooling.

Performance scales with available VRAM:

8GB VRAM:  7B models (4-bit quantized)
12GB VRAM: 13B models (4-bit quantized)
24GB VRAM: 30B+ models (4-bit quantized)
48GB+ VRAM: 70B models, less quantization

Multi-GPU configurations allow splitting models across multiple cards. NVLink enables faster communication between cards, and consumer motherboards typically support two to four GPUs, though linear performance scaling is not guaranteed.

Apple Silicon

Apple's M-series chips offer compelling options for local LLMs. The unified memory architecture provides advantages, with M1 Max supporting up to sixty-four gigabytes of unified memory and M2 Ultra reaching one hundred ninety-two gigabytes. Metal Performance Shaders provide optimization for these chips. Performance is competitive with mid-range NVIDIA GPUs while offering significant power efficiency advantages. The ecosystem support is growing rapidly, with llama.cpp performing excellently on Apple Silicon.

Popular Local LLM Frameworks

Ollama

Ollama is best suited for beginners seeking quick setup. Installation and usage is straightforward:

# Install Ollama
curl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh

# Run a model
ollama run llama3.1

# Pull specific models
ollama pull mistral
ollama pull codellama

Ollama provides one-command installation, automatic model management, a built-in API server, and cross-platform support.

llama.cpp

For maximum performance and flexibility, llama.cpp is the framework of choice:

# Clone and build
git clone https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp
cd llama.cpp
make -j

# Run inference
./main -m models/llama-7b.gguf -p "Hello, world"

This pure C/C++ implementation is optimized for CPU and Apple Silicon, supports the GGUF format, and offers extensive quantization options.

LM Studio

LM Studio provides the best GUI-based interaction experience through a desktop application available for Windows, Mac, and Linux. It includes a visual model browser and downloader, built-in chat interface, and local API server functionality.

vLLM

For production deployments, vLLM offers optimized throughput:

from vllm import LLM, SamplingParams

llm = LLM(model="meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B")
sampling_params = SamplingParams(temperature=0.7, max_tokens=256)

outputs = llm.generate(["Hello, my name is"], sampling_params)

vLLM features PagedAttention for memory efficiency, continuous batching, and an OpenAI-compatible API.

Model Selection Guide

Size vs. Capability Trade-offs

Seven billion parameter models like Mistral 7B and Llama 3.1 8B offer fast inference on consumer hardware and handle simple tasks well, including summarization, simple question-answering, and code completion. Models in the thirteen to thirty billion parameter range provide better reasoning capabilities but require more VRAM or quantization. Examples include Llama 2 13B and CodeLlama 34B, suitable for complex analysis and creative writing. Seventy billion parameter and larger models approach cloud-model quality but demand significant hardware. Llama 3.1 70B and Mixtral 8x22B fall into this category, appropriate for research and high-stakes applications.

Quantization Explained

Quantization reduces model precision to fit in less memory while maintaining quality. Common formats include FP16 (full precision baseline), Q8 (8-bit with minimal quality loss), Q5 (5-bit offering good balance), Q4 (4-bit with significant compression), and Q3 (3-bit for maximum compression).

FP16: Full precision, baseline quality
Q8:   8-bit, minimal quality loss
Q5:   5-bit, good balance
Q4:   4-bit, significant compression
Q3:   3-bit, maximum compression

Q4 quantization achieves sixty to seventy percent size reduction with quality loss typically ranging from one to three percent on benchmarks. Q4_K_M or Q5_K_M represent recommended starting points for most use cases.

Specialized Models

Code generation models include CodeLlama, DeepSeek Coder, StarCoder, and WizardCoder, all optimized for programming tasks. Instruction-following models like Alpaca-based variants, Vicuna, and WizardLM are fine-tuned for chat and instruction handling. Domain-specific models serve particular fields, including medical alternatives to Med-PaLM, fine-tuned legal models, and FinGPT variants for finance.

Setting Up Your First Local LLM

Step 1: Assess Your Hardware

# Check GPU memory (NVIDIA)
nvidia-smi

# Check system memory
free -h

# Check disk space
df -h

Step 2: Choose Your Stack

Beginners should install Ollama, download Llama 3.1 8B, and start chatting immediately. Developers may prefer setting up llama.cpp or vLLM, downloading GGUF models from HuggingFace, and configuring API endpoints.

Step 3: Download Models

From Ollama:

ollama pull llama3.1:8b
ollama pull mistral
ollama pull codellama:7b

From HuggingFace:

# Using huggingface-cli
huggingface-cli download TheBloke/Llama-2-7B-GGUF

Step 4: Run and Test

# Interactive chat
ollama run llama3.1

# API server
ollama serve
# Then query at http://localhost:11434

Optimization Techniques

Memory Optimization

Techniques to reduce memory include using quantized models (Q4, Q5), enabling KV cache compression, limiting context length, and using flash attention implementations. Context length significantly impacts memory requirements, with 2K context being fast and low memory, 4K suitable for standard use, 8K enabling longer documents, and 32K or greater having significant memory impact.

2K context:  Fast, low memory
4K context:  Standard use
8K context:  Longer documents
32K+ context: Significant memory impact

Speed Optimization

Batching requests by processing multiple prompts together amortizes model loading overhead and improves GPU utilization. GPU-specific optimizations include enabling tensor cores and optimizing memory allocation:

# Enable tensor cores (NVIDIA)
export CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=0

# Optimize memory allocation
export PYTORCH_CUDA_ALLOC_CONF=expandable_segments:True

Production Considerations

Production deployments require load balancing with multiple model instances, request queuing, health checking, and graceful degradation. Monitoring should track inference latency, memory usage, error rates, and alert on anomalies.

Common Use Cases

Private Document Analysis

# Process sensitive documents locally
def analyze_document(text):
    response = ollama.chat(
        model='llama3.1',
        messages=[{
            'role': 'user',
            'content': f'Analyze this document: {text}'
        }]
    )
    return response['message']['content']

Code Assistant

# Local coding assistant
def code_complete(prompt, language):
    response = ollama.generate(
        model='codellama',
        prompt=f'Complete this {language} code:\n{prompt}'
    )
    return response['response']

Offline Applications

Local LLMs enable field operations without connectivity, deployment in air-gapped environments, embedded systems integration, and edge computing scenarios.

Challenges and Limitations

Performance Gaps

Compared to cloud models, smaller local models have reduced capability and less encoded knowledge. The trade-off between speed and quality means some tasks genuinely require larger models. Mitigation strategies include using specialized fine-tuned models, implementing RAG to address knowledge gaps, chaining smaller models for complex tasks, and accepting appropriate use case limitations.

Maintenance Burden

Ongoing requirements include hardware maintenance, model updates, security patches, and performance monitoring. Organizations must plan for these responsibilities when choosing local deployment.

Resource Constraints

VRAM determines maximum model size, concurrent users are limited by hardware capacity, training requires significantly more resources than inference, and power consumption becomes a consideration for larger deployments.

Future of Local AI

Emerging Trends

Smaller models are becoming more capable through ongoing efficiency improvements. Models like Phi-3 and Gemma demonstrate increasing capability per parameter. Hardware improvements through new GPU generations, AI-specific accelerators, improved memory bandwidth, and better power efficiency continue advancing. Software optimizations deliver continuous inference improvements, better quantization methods, improved context handling, and cross-platform optimization.

Running local LLMs has never been more accessible. Whether you need privacy, cost savings, or complete control over your AI infrastructure, the tools and models are now available for everyone from hobbyists to enterprises. Start small, experiment, and scale as your needs grow.

Recommended Prompts

Looking to put these concepts into practice? Check out these related prompts on Mark-t.ai: